Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The "HONOR" of Food Stamps

If you are anything like me you've asked yourself on more than one occasion if liberal thinkers (I know oxymoron) study the same script.  How else to explain the fact that at least two individuals Nancy Pelosi and Jessie Jackson have attempted to attach the word "honor" to food stamps.

Their contention is that Newt Gingrich's labeling of President Obama as the "Food Stamp President" should not be a derisive label but one of honor.  Nancy Pelosi even went so far as to challenge Christians to follow the adages of the Book of Matthew that refer to feeding the hungry and providing for the poor.  It is kind of interesting that liberals spend 1/2 of their time denying Christ and the other 1/2 wanting people to emulate Him.  Video available at: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/03/24/Pelosi-Proud-More-People-On-Food-Stamps

They would have you believe that President Obama is performing an unparalleled work of charity by feeding so many hungry people.  But is it really charity when you are doing your good works with other people's money?  It would also stand to reason that if we were going to be bound to the scriptural adage about feeding the hungry we should probably adhere to the instructions from the Apostle Paul in his epistle to the Thessalonians where he admonished them that "For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat."  So if we are supposed to take the Bible literally, both instructions would appear to be binding.

Didn't Nancy Pelosi's daughter make a short film about those she called "Welfare Queens" that showed able bodied men and women who were just looking for "Obama Money"?  One would have to question the "honor" in this wouldn't they?  There is also the story of the Austrian man who cut off his own foot rather than go back to work - but lets stick to this country shall we?

Please don't take this the wrong way, this is not an attempt to brand anyone as a slacker or malingerer but rather to exam what if any amount of 'honor' can be attached to the term "Food Stamp President'.  Are there people who need and deserve food stamps?  Absolutely.  But there is no question that many individuals are on food stamps simply because they can be.

Years ago someone requiring public assistance was looked down upon, this was hardly justified - but it certainly did happen.   Today the stigma attached to receiving food stamps is virtually non-existent and you have to wonder if that is a good thing.  Are we as American's filling a need, or are we simply acting as an enabler and rewarding bad behavior?  Unfortunately the answer is 'a little bit of both'.

Regardless of why food stamps are being provided (and you would be hard pressed not to say something to the effect of "Because the economy is so god awful") how does the President deserve a (quoting Nancy Pelosi here) "Badge of Honor" for becoming the President with the highest number of individuals on food stamps during his tenure?  What exactly is honorable about that?  It would seem that Pelosi and Jackson are desperately trying to put lipstick on a pig, but we all know that when it is said and done a pig is still a pig, lipstick or not.

Let's not confuse our children and grandchildren about what Honor really is all about.  Isn't it about sacrifice and patriotism and the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few?  Isn't it really about stuff like that?

According to Webster:

Definition of HONOR

1
a : good name or public esteem : reputation b : a showing of usually merited respect : recognition <pay honor to our founder>
2
: privilege <had the honor of joining the captain for dinner>
3
: a person of superior standing —now used especially as a title for a holder of high office <if Your Honor please>
4
: one whose worth brings respect or fame : credit <an honor to the profession>
5
: the center point of the upper half of an armorial escutcheon
6
: an evidence or symbol of distinction: as a : an exalted title or rank b (1) : badge, decoration (2) : a ceremonial rite or observance <buried with full military honors> c : an award in a contest or field of competition d archaic : a gesture of deference : bow e plural (1) : an academic distinction conferred on a superior student (2) : a course of study for superior students supplementing or replacing a regular course
7
: chastity, purity <fought fiercely for her honor and her life — Barton Black>
8
a : a keen sense of ethical conduct : integrity <a man of honor> b : one's word given as a guarantee of performance <on my honor, I will be there>
9
plural : social courtesies or civilities extended by a host <asked her to do the honors>
10
a (1) : an ace, king, queen, jack, or ten especially of the trump suit in bridge (2) : the scoring value of honors held in bridge —usually used in plural b : the privilege of playing first from the tee in golf

Examples of HONOR

  1. These people deserve to be treated with honor.
  2. The team brought honor to the school.
  3. The building was named in honor of the city's founder.
  4. He was prepared to fight to defend his family's honor.
  5. She has a keen sense of honor.
  6. He would not do it as a matter of honor.
  7. He's a man of honor.
  8. It was an honor to be invited.
  9. Many of the Persians, despite belonging to the Barbarian Other, come off with honor and dignity in his pages, even during the final narrative of Xerxes' invasion. —Peter Green, New York Review of Books, 15 May 2008
Where do you think food stamps might fit into the above list?

Wouldn't the honor be found in reducing the number of families on food stamps by increasing employment rolls?  It sure seems that way to me.

PMA

Friday, March 23, 2012

What do you see when you look at Brian Terry Mr. President?

President Obama recently spoke out about the senseless murder of a young man in Florida.  Trayvon Martin who was only 17 years old was unarmed when he was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch captain.  


After Jay Carney initially said on Thursday that the White House would not get involved in the issue, President Obama spoke today in the Rose Garden and said ""Obviously, this is a tragedy. I can only imagine what these parents are going through. And when I think about this boy, I think about my own kids. And, you know, I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this and that everybody pulls together -- federal, state and local -- to figure out exactly how this tragedy happened," Obama said.  He added: "But my main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."

This outpouring of sympathy and emotion was apparently very heart-felt on the part of the President, but I couldn't help but wonder where this desire for justice was when Brian Terry was killed.

In case you don't remember Brian Terry, the following can be found on the Officer Down Memorial Page "Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was shot and killed near Rio Rico, Arizona, while attempting to apprehend a group of armed subjects. The suspects had been preying on illegal immigrants with the intent to rob them.

Agent Terry and several other agents were attempting to arrest the group when shots were exchanged between the suspects and agents. Agent Terry was struck in the pelvis by a round fired by a suspect armed with an AK-47."\

Brian Terry was not unarmed as was Trayvon Martin.  Brian was in fact armed with what amounted to a bean bag weapon.  The weapons used to kill him however were also supplied by the United States government but they were not 'bean  bag' weapons, but rather the far more deadly AK-47.  These weapons were provided to Mexican criminals under the failed program refereed to in the media as "Fast and Furious".

Other than demonstratively denying any knowledge of the failed operation on his or Attorney General Eric Holder's part, President Obama has not addressed the death of Brian Terry, let alone said thing as significant as "..it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this and that everybody pulls together -- federal, state and local -- to figure out exactly how this tragedy happened," 

Rather than speaking with the family, President Obama dispatched Janet Napolitano to the fallen agent's funeral where rather than comforting the grief stricken family she used the occasion to do her bit for the re-election campaign of President Obama saying to a local reporter “He’s (Obama) done more in the last two years than any other president.”   Brian Terry's family was (understandably) not consoled by this remark.

Neither did the President demand that "we investigate every aspect of this and that everybody pulls together -- federal, state and local --" rather the administration which has touted itself as the most transparent ever has attempted to cover up the event as was reported by  Judicial Watch:  "The Obama Administration has abruptly sealed court records containing alarming details of how Mexican drug smugglers murdered a U.S. Border patrol agent with a gun connected to a failed federal experiment that allowed firearms to be smuggled into Mexico."

There has also been a noticeable lack of 'celebrities' like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson making any appearances on behalf of Brian Terry or the Terry family.

You can make the argument that Brian Terry as a Border Agent knew the risks that he was taking - unlike Trayvon Martin.  He was certainly not aware however of the fact that his government was supplying his enemies with weapons far superior to the ones that he was carrying to perform his duties.

Perhaps any son that President Obama may have would not look like Brian Terry, but that should not keep him from receiving the same respect and the same desire for justice that is shown towards the death of Trayvon Martin.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/23/obama-calls-florida-shooting-death-tragedy-says-his-son-would-look-like-trayvon/#ixzz1q0QRyURM

PMA

The Flim Flam Men Ride Again.....

The only thing worse than a tragedy is someone or some group of people attempting to score political points from it.  That being said the tragedy that is the shooting of a young black male Trayvon Martin has proceeded to become if possible an even larger tragedy.

Seemingly out of no where it those who profit by stoking the flames of racial divide have materialized and proceeded to do what they do best, promote hatred and distrust.

In so much as the death of this young man is a horror and racial profiling contributes to injustice, attempts to score political points from Trayvon's death are a horror in and of themselves.

Consider one example of this, Newsbusters reports that "MSNBC analyst and Democratic strategist Karen Finney disgustingly smeared Rush Limbaugh and several Republican presidential candidates on Thursday, charging that the racist hate of these conservatives had "lethal consequences" in the case of Trayvon Martin, an African American teen shot in Florida."

The story goes on to say "After decrying "bigotry and stereotypes tak[ing] over our better judgment," Finney sneeringly insisted that when "Rush Limbaugh calls a presidential candidate, Senator Barack Obama, a magic negro...In the case of Trayvon, those festering stereotypes had lethal consequences.""

As Newsbuster's points out, Rush Limbaugh did not originate the "magic negro" term - it originated in a story in the Los Angeles Times.  Even that however is relatively immaterial as it is a grand canyon like leap to go from the term "magic negro" to the death of Trayvon Martin.  That does not deter Karen Finney however as she continues in her effort to insure that no Conservative escapes unscathed in her reporting by including Republican Presidential candidates Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum on her list of people who contributed to the horror of Trayvon Martin's murder.

Am I the only one who finds this line of thinking just a little unreasonable?  When Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton descend on Florida to participate in marches and demonstrations am I the only one who wonders why they didn't show the African Americans killed in Chicago recently the same respect? What about 6 year old Aliyah Shell?  This poor child was killed while playing on her front porch, but apparently no one is marching for her.  Is it because the crimes in Chicago were attributed to gang violence and 'black on black' crime?  Or was it sadly due to the fact that Florida offered move TV cameras and more outrage that could be exploited?
We should all mourn the death of Tayvon Martin, it was a senseless act and should be vilified, but we should all do more than bemoan the deaths of Tayvon Martin and Aliyah Shell and the scores of African American young men and women who die daily in the streets of our cities, we should collectively do something.
How much have the many public figures who flock to Florida done to erase gang violence?  What has our government done to reduce the specter of unemployment that  has devastated our inner cities?  Is anything really being done to make a difference, or is Tayvon's death being used as a vehicle to promote division and hatred while the deaths of so many others are being ignored
PMA

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Bob Ayers - The Ugliest American Rides again...

What exactly is it with this guy?  Recently Ayers was in the news again for his moronic  remarks about Andrew Brietbart.  Ayers had the audacity to call the recently deceased Brietbart a "bomb thrower" of all things.  I am just guessing here, but in my opinion Ayers was trying to be cute.  Problem is there is absolutely nothing 'cute' about this guy.


Ayers spent many years as a domestic terrorist making real bombs for the Weather Underground.  He has never felt the need to apologize or repent for his past. He has been linked to President Obama in many ways and it is a good idea to 'vett' our President's association with Mr. Ayers before the November election.


How close were Obama and Ayers?  Well, its not like they were friends or anything.  President Obama launched his political career in Ayers' living room, the Obama's and the Ayers' babysat each others children and often had meals together.  Michelle Obama worked in the same law firm as Bill Ayers wife, Bernadine Dohrn at Sidley Austin where  Barack Obama was also an intern. Robert Ayers and Barack Obama also served on a committee together but....wait a moment, they do sound pretty much like friends don't they?


In his defense President Obama said  "..the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was eight years old, somehow reflects [sic] on me and my values doesn't make much sense."  But it was in 2001 that unrepentant terrorist and certified cretin Ayers tread on an American flag in the infamous photo depicting this despicable act (seen here http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31471_William_Ayers_Stepping_on_the_US_Flag_in_2001)


But in all fairness a lot of Presidents have hung out with guys who hated America.  There was President umm, hmmm,.....it appears President Obama is the only one I can think of. 


You have to ask yourself "Why on earth did President Obama get away with this?" "How was he ever elected with such an association being known?"  The answer plain and simple is racism.  Yes, that ugly word and all it's ugly connotations.  It was made to appear as if the only individuals who would dare question the relationship between our soon to be President and a known unrepentant (can use that word enough) terrorist who tried to kill Americans just like Al Qaeda has tried and done were racists.


What was the connection between racism and questioning President Obama's association with this slug?  Simple - there was none.  So patriotic Americans (you know, the kind that don't like to see the flag stomped on and all that) were made to look like fools, and worse - racist fools.


Hopefully patriots today can shake of the shame of false allegations of racial prejudiced and not feel the need to apologize about being angry when some one desecrates the flag.  If the only thing that President Obama was guilty of was (in the words of Sarah Palin) "palling around" with this guy - that in and of it's self should be enough to remove him from the highest office in this land.  God please if I am not right in anything else, let me be right in this.


PMA



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIGZA6girnI